2000 Mercury Sable vs. 1958 Opel Rekord
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 614 kg more than 1958 Opel Rekord.
Because 1958 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercury Sable | 1958 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Mercury | Opel |
Model | Sable | Rekord |
Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1680 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |