2000 Mercury Sable vs. 1965 MG 1100
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 749 kg more than 1965 MG 1100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (248 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercury Sable | 1965 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Mercury | MG |
| Model | Sable | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 248 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2380 mm |
