2000 Mercury Sable vs. 1965 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,522 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 224 kg more than 1965 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1965 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1965 Pontiac Tempest has manual transmission. 1965 Pontiac Tempest will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercury Sable | 1965 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Mercury | Pontiac |
| Model | Sable | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3522 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2930 mm |
