2000 Mercury Sable vs. 1986 Renault 18
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 18 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 589 kg more than 1986 Renault 18.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (248 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 18. (104 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 18. 2000 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1986 Renault 18 has manual transmission. 1986 Renault 18 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercury Sable | 1986 Renault 18 | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Sable | 18 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 248 Nm | 104 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |