2000 Mercury Sable vs. 2001 Suzuki SX
To start off, 2001 Suzuki SX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 38 kg more than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (248 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercury Sable | 2001 Suzuki SX | |
| Make | Mercury | Suzuki |
| Model | Sable | SX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1298 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
| Torque | 248 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 1536 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2460 mm |
