2000 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 90 kg more than 2010 Mazda Tribute.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (248 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda Tribute. (232 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda Tribute. 2000 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda Tribute has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda Tribute will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Mercury Sable 2010 Mazda Tribute
Make Mercury Mazda
Model Sable Tribute
Year Released 2000 2010
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3001 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 171 HP
Torque 248 Nm 232 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1574 kg 1484 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4442 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1725 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2619 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 66 L