2000 Mercury Sable vs. 2012 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2012 GMC Sierra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Sierra weights approximately 737 kg more than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Because 2012 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 GMC Sierra (454 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Sable. (248 Nm). This means 2012 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercury Sable | 2012 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Mercury | GMC |
Model | Sable | Sierra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 315 HP |
Torque | 248 Nm | 454 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 2311 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5847 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1875 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3645 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 98 L |