2000 Mini MK VII vs. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere
To start off, 2000 Mini MK VII is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2000 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere should accelerate faster than 2000 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere weights approximately 805 kg more than 2000 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mini MK VII, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mini MK VII | 1954 Plymouth Belvedere | |
Make | Mini | Plymouth |
Model | MK VII | Belvedere |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6130 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2930 mm |