2000 Mini MK VII vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Mini MK VII is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mini MK VII (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mini MK VII should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 245 kg more than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Renault Clio (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 1998 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mini MK VII | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mini | Renault |
| Model | MK VII | Clio |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6130 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2580 mm |
