2000 Mini MK VII vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mini MK VII (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mini MK VII should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Proton 400 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mini MK VII (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Mini MK VII will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mini MK VII | 2003 Proton 400 | |
Make | Mini | Proton |
Model | MK VII | 400 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6130 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |