2000 Mini MK VII vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2000 Mini MK VII. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mini MK VII | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mini | Holden |
Model | MK VII | Epica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |