2000 Mini MK VII vs. 2011 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 289 more horse power than 2000 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2000 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1110 kg more than 2000 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2011 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mini MK VII, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (515 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mini MK VII.

Compare all specifications: