2000 Mitsubishi Dion vs. 1962 Morgan 4
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Dion is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Dion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi Dion (133 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Dion should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Dion weights approximately 720 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Dion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Dion | 1962 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Morgan |
| Model | Dion | 4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |
