2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 2,348 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse (145 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse weights approximately 190 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse (214 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Eclipse | 360 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2348 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 58 L |