2000 Mitsubishi L 200 vs. 2004 Rover 75

To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi L 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi L 200. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi L 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 weights approximately 331 kg more than 2004 Rover 75.

Because 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 (245 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 2004 Rover 75
Make Mitsubishi Rover
Model L 200 75
Year Released 2000 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2477 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 160 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1705 kg 1374 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2970 mm 2750 mm