2000 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 1967 Pontiac GTO
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac GTO would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 30 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 1967 Pontiac GTO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Pontiac GTO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Magna | 1967 Pontiac GTO | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
| Model | Magna | GTO |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2351 cc | 6375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2930 mm |
