2000 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 44 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Magna | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Magna | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2351 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
