2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 690 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Studebaker |
Model | Minica | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 4246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2980 mm |