2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 430 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Sunbeam |
| Model | Minica | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2190 mm |
