2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 1983 Toyota Model F
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Model F is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Toyota Model F weights approximately 590 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Toyota Model F. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Toyota Model F has automatic transmission and 2000 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Toyota Model F will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 1983 Toyota Model F | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Minica | Model F |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1812 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2240 mm |
