2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 148 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Minica | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2550 mm |