2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1846 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe has automatic transmission and 2000 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Minica | Tahoe |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 2556 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2007 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1953 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2946 mm |
