2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ka weights approximately 177 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 2010 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Minica | Ka |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 887 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2450 mm |
