2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Minica | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2360 mm |
