2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 1100 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Minica | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2580 mm |