2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2000 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 2011 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Minica | Malibu |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2852 mm |