2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2013 Mazda CX-05
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-05 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-05 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-05 weights approximately 845 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda CX-05. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Mazda CX-05 has automatic transmission and 2000 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-05 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 2013 Mazda CX-05 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mazda |
| Model | Minica | CX-05 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4555 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2165 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |
