2000 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1081 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo XC60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Minica | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1791 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2774 mm |
