2000 Mitsubishi Montero vs. 1963 Seat 1400

To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1400 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero weights approximately 840 kg more than 1963 Seat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Seat 1400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero (309 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 1400. (88 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 1400. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero has automatic transmission and 1963 Seat 1400 has manual transmission. 1963 Seat 1400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: