2000 Mitsubishi Montero vs. 1996 Proton 400

To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero (113 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero weights approximately 790 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero (309 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 400 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: