2000 Mitsubishi Montero vs. 2011 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2011 Kia Cee'd is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Montero would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cee'd (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero weights approximately 564 kg more than 2011 Kia Cee'd.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero (309 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Kia Cee'd. (187 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Montero | 2011 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Kia |
| Model | Montero | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1341 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 53 L |
