2000 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2004 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2004 Toyota MR2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota MR2 weights approximately 215 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Toyota MR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2004 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Pajero | MR2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 700 cc | 1793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
