2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2011 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Tata |
| Model | Space Runner | Nano |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
