2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 100 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Space Wagon | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2960 mm |