2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 797 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volkswagen |
| Model | Space Wagon | Polo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2307 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2470 mm |
