2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 2010 Dodge Ram

To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 927 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.

Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2010 Dodge Ram
Make Mitsubishi Dodge
Model Space Wagon Ram
Year Released 2000 2010
Body Type Minivan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2999 cc 6690 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 350 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 2537 kg
Vehicle Length 4610 mm 6300 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 2000 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 4080 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]