2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 854 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
| Model | Space Wagon | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2364 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2154 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2916 mm |
