2000 Mitsubishi SSS vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSS would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 173 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (162 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (270 Nm). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi SSS | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
Model | SSS | RS3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |