2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 895 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (152 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | SSU | 120 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1010 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 45 L |
