2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 205 kg more than 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp (451 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 1985 De Tomaso Longchamp | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | De Tomaso |
| Model | SSU | Longchamp |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5763 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 451 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1700 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
