2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,134 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 375 kg more than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | SSU | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3134 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2740 mm |
