2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 325 kg more than 2002 Acura CL.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Acura CL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
| Model | SSU | CL |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1580 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 65 L |
