2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 370 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Epica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. (195 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 2006 Chevrolet Epica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
| Model | SSU | Epica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1535 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 65 L |
