2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2006 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2006 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 365 kg more than 2006 Nissan Pathfinder.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 2006 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | SSU | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3949 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 395 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1540 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 80 L |
