2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2006 Volvo S60

To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S60 (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 336 kg more than 2006 Volvo S60.

Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S60 (280 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU has automatic transmission and 2006 Volvo S60 has manual transmission. 2006 Volvo S60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: