2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2010 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2010 GMC Yukon is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Yukon (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Yukon weights approximately 628 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 GMC Yukon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Yukon (565 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2010 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 2010 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Mitsubishi | GMC |
Model | SSU | Yukon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 565 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 2533 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 98 L |