2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2011 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2011 GMC Sierra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 GMC Sierra (353 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Sierra weights approximately 754 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 GMC Sierra (506 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2011 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 2011 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Mitsubishi | GMC |
Model | SSU | Sierra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 353 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 506 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 2659 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 129 L |