2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2011 Holden Epica

To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.

Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2011 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: