2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2012 Nissan NV
To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan NV (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NV should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan NV weights approximately 773 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan NV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan NV (381 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan NV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 2012 Nissan NV | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | SSU | NV |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 2678 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3711 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 106 L |