2000 Morgan Aero 8 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Morgan Aero 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Morgan Aero 8 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Morgan Aero 8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 75 weights approximately 335 kg more than 2000 Morgan Aero 8.
Because 2000 Morgan Aero 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Morgan Aero 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 2000 Morgan Aero 8 has manual transmission. 2000 Morgan Aero 8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Morgan Aero 8 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Morgan | Rover |
Model | Aero 8 | 75 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Top Speed | 260 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1305 kg |